3 min read
What Genomic Foundation Models Actually Read
What Genomic Foundation Models Actually Read cover

Genomic foundation models post strong numbers on tasks like “which organism is this coding sequence from.” The worry is that they are reading codon composition, which a lookup table could do. So I built the experiment that separates composition from arrangement.

Synonymous codon swaps let you rewrite a sequence so the protein is unchanged and the codon composition is byte-for-byte identical, while the order of codons — and the dinucleotides at codon boundaries — changes. Whatever the model still reads afterwards is arrangement.

The interest traces back to my Biosecurity Atlas, an earlier project mapping the biosafety-and-AI landscape, which got me asking how much we should actually trust these models.

  • Designed a composition-exact counterfactual benchmark: a few thousand coding sequences across several taxa from a single corpus, eight rewrite conditions, and a per-sequence assertion that composition really is unchanged rather than assumed
  • Scored it two independent ways — a task-coupled read-out (per-layer embeddings through one fixed linear head, balanced-accuracy drop, stratified paired bootstrap) and a label-free one (the model’s own masked-codon distribution, no head, no labels, no split) — so a result has to survive both
  • Anchored everything to reference levels with no model in them: a summary-statistic classifier and gradient boosting on codon frequency
  • Found order carries real but small signal, well below composition, meaning a composition-preserving rearrangement is invisible to any screen built on composition alone
  • Showed a linear probe and a direct causal intervention disagree about which feature drives the decision, so decodability is not use
  • Established that sensitivity to these rewrites varies widely across more than an order of magnitude in model size, with no monotone trend

Work in progress. A related manuscript was submitted to a workshop in August 2026 and is under review; nothing here is peer-reviewed. Because the application is DNA synthesis biosecurity screening, I am not publishing the specific rewrite recipes, effect sizes, or which models were defeated ahead of review. Fuller write-up on the genomic AI page.